|
The
failure of multiculturalism in
Europe
and the need for a EU Roma Policy
Empty
rhetoric, money spent with no strategy or wrong strategy, silence and
non-action are often the subject of indeed sometimes arguable criticism
coming from the Civil Society regarding the social inclusion process
lead by the European Commission (EC). These are sometimes stridently
argued by Roma human rights activists frustrated with what we perceive a
far too slow pace of the European Union when it comes to Roma related
issues.
The
mainstreaming approach of the European Commission, even in the eyes of
the most optimistic bureaucrats in Brussels have failed when it comes to
tackling racism and social exclusion of ethnic and religious minorities.
Unfortunately,
often in my view, when it comes to the poverty stricken, excluded and
discriminated Roma, Muslim and people of African descent multiculturalism has been used as a form of educated justification
for racism. Instead of saying “niggers” there are many saying
“culturally different Africans” but in fact the meaning didn’t
change as in
Europe
, we continue to treat people of ethnic and religious minorities
sometimes as “niggers”.
The
worst social events in the last years in Europe which translated in huge
economical loses were in fact the Roma riots in February 2004 in
Slovakia and the riots in autumn 2005 in France.
Violent
but lower scale incidents also motivated by social exclusion and racism
happened in
Romania
,
Hungary
,
Italy
and
Bulgaria
in 2007. Those events proved once again an extreme and unfortunately
tolerated level of anti-Gypsyism in EU member states and a clear problem
with the European Multiculturalism concept.
A
slip of tongue of Commissioner Frattini made people wonder that anti-Gypsyism
maybe not that strongly rebuked within the European Commission itself.
In
the text of the Year of Equal Opportunities which was in 2007, one can
find that the European Commission considers that Roma are the “most
disadvantaged ethnic minority group in
Europe
” and are facing “significant barriers in employment and education”. The
Communication further stated that “disadvantages experienced by some
communities, e.g., the Roma
are so wide-scale and embedded in the structure of society that positive
action may be necessary to remedy the nature of their exclusion.”
The
European Commission, the governing body of the EU, does not employ any
Roma despite estimating the number of Roma in the
Union
at around 8 millions. It has no Roma strategy or dedicated structure
working on the Roma issues. It does not even employ Roma experts on
temporary contracts. The Commission on the other side employed in a top
and completely unrelated position the ex-dentist of by now a famous
ex-Commissioner. Unfortunately there are other similar cases surfacing
from time to time in the press.
When
it comes to multiculturalism, the number of people of African, Indian,
Pakistani and
Caribbean
origins and especially of people of Muslim faith employed by the
Commission in other than cleaning jobs is simply abysmal.
The
Open Method of Coordination is practically the only available pan
European instrument at this moment which can bring about changes
regarding the social inclusion of excluded ethnic minorities.
The
Open Method of Coordination up to this moment failed when it comes to
Roma and there is no better proof than the events it
Italy
.
Italy
practically didn’t access any EU Funds targeting the social inclusion
of Roma or had any strategy about what to do about the social inclusion
of Roma.
Another
EU mechanism is needed to address the situation and the Romanian
government advanced the idea of a EU Roma Agency to deal with this
issues, idea which was supported by the Resolution of the European
Parliament from 31st of January this year.
Indeed
there were around 275 million Euros targeting Roma in the last funding
period but this funding has been done without any long term strategy.
Let me repeat this, 275 million without any CLEAR or LONG TERM STRATEGY.
I
think we keep forgetting that Roma are EU citizens and fail to take in
consideration that social exclusion travels and that without a clear
long term EU Roma Policy we can spend billions without any significant
progress. Bribing Roma out of a EU Country as
France
,
Ireland
and
Finland
tried and miserably failed, proves that European Union needs such a EU
policy.
There
are lots of reasons for such a policy and for a better coordinating
mechanism such as a EU Roma Agency and those were emphasized strongly by
the European Parliament resolution. On such precedent we can eventually
build policies which to avoid the many attacks EU has to deal with
regarding the status of second and third class citizens of people from
different ethnic and religious background.
There
are countries who have included specific Roma chapters in their
operational plans (in fact all the Decade countries which are EU
members) but this has not been replicated at the European level. We need
long term measures and not piece-meal action and the EC has a role in
leading such a EU Roma Policy as it has a leading role in meeting the
Lisbon Strategy objectives.
There
is no help in switching the responsibilities between different
stakeholders. We have a good Commissioner in the person of Vladimir
Spidla who I am sure if strongly supported will be able to change the
existing situation and hopefully bring about major changes within the
Commission. Those changes need to be taken in consideration and I will
emphasize here that we need to take in consideration the Roma input and
treat Roma as equal citizens. The choice of the Commission when it comes
to Roma responsible persons within need to be taken with Roma
consultation if we want an effective and constructive dialogue.
Indeed
it is important to have Reports but unfortunately the Commission has
been putting aside any relevant actions waiting for reports which
practically all have the same main recommendations as the report in 2004
and the Parliament resolutions for the last three years. Those
recommendations are clear:
a.
EU Roma Policy backed by a EU Community Action Plan for Roma,
b.
Roma focused funds,
c.
structural and relevant changes in the Commission which to be able to
change the way things are at this moment.
The
Conclusion of the EU Council from 14th of December made clear
there is political back up from the Member states on this issue and
member states are ready to take strong actions. The only player which
seems to need to commit to take similar actions is the European
Commission.
The
Commission and especially Commissioner Spidla have done some important
work and there is no doubt about it. Unfortunately it is not enough. I
hope that the Conference in September which the Commission is organizing
will signal a fundamental change of the ways things were up to this
moment and not just a place where to justify inaction.
The
Commission rightfully argued in the past that member states have the
main responsibilities in tackling the social inclusion of Roma.
But
if we are to compare what
Hungary
and
Romania
did on one side and what the EC did surprisingly this comparison is very
much favorable to the
Member
State
. Both
Hungary
and
Romania
have Roma focused body, include Roma in their governments, have Roma
strategies and Roma focused budgets. None of these are replicated within
the European Commission.
The
Commission is left behind in my opinion and looking at results on the
ground, it has done too
little to stimulate Member States in either accessing funds targeting
the social inclusion of Roma, or providing steering in such a complex
and pan-European spread issue.
The
Commission also failed to take in consideration the 7th Roma
resolutions of the European Parliament and didn’t use the exceptional
opportunities opened by the Decade of Roma Inclusion a political
instrument agreed by 5 EU member states. The Decade as well as the OSCE
Action Plan for Roma and Sinti ratified by all EU members states and the
Council of Europe initiatives on Roma should be more than enough
precedents for developing a strong and solid EU policy which could make
sure the money available will be spent with effective and long term
results.
I
believe that in the European Union in general we spend far much more
effort into justifying rather inefficient and sometimes easy to be
criticized as window dressing measures than doing things which to have
an impact on the ground.
I
do believe we the Roma activist and Roma NGOs are also at fault with the
existing situation as we tend to be maybe too critical and rarely
solution focused. Sometimes I believe we fail to make clear that we want
to help and build together with the other stakeholders and lose energy
in defending sometime inflexible positions.
Hope
today’s talks will signal a change and all of us will focus on
effective and deliverable solutions able to curb the existing situation.
|